But maybe, just maybe, it’s not worth it: maybe the neat little points you make that way aren’t intellectually substantive enough to justify the risks you take on their behalf. There could be a better way to go about this business of trying to understand human behavior and explain it to others. That other way will require more patience, more research, possibly more education (Lehrer has two bachelor’s degrees); and it will probably result in books that don’t sell as well, so the lifestyle will take a hit. But if you can make a real and lasting contribution to the human understanding of ourselves, the tradeoffs are more than worth it. I hope Jonah Lehrer finds that better path.

Alan Jacobs on how Jonah Lehrer’s fall from wunderkind grace might, might just rescue him from “the Gladwellian intellectual cosmos [in which] immensely complex ideas and experiences get boiled down to simplistic binary oppositions or are run through a single interpretative filter.”

Katamari Portal

Image from Squid Von Bob via Kotaku.

A tale in two photographs

This past Friday, July 20, marked the anniversary of the Apollo 11 moon landing. As a commemoration, The Atlantic‘s Alexis Madrigal posted a set of photographs from the entire mission, from conception and planning to launch to landing and return. There are two photographs from this set I’d like to highlight, because they hit me in a powerful and unexpected way.

Growing up in the 80s and 90s, I was pretty spoiled by a wealth of detailed images from space. I remember devouring the photographs in National Geographic each time Voyager 2 encountered on of the outer planets for the first time. Then, as now, satellite photographs of earth were an unremarkable, everyday thing, as routine as the weather report on the news.

I’d seen the picture of the earth rising over the moon’s horizon before, and I’ve always thought it was cool, but it never really blew my mind. In fact, I was, when I was younger, more fascinated by the episode or two of the original Star Trek where the Enterprise shows the Earth on its viewscreen. The image was immediately unreal, globe-like, and it took me a minute or two to realize that it was primarily because the image was of a world without clouds, which I knew instantly and instinctively to be wrong because I’d seen the real thing.

However, I did finally get that moment of wonder from Madrigal’s visual narrative, not so much from an individual image as from the juxtaposition of two otherwise fairly unremarkable photos.

The first is a picture from space of Mexico and the American southwest.

Earth, near

None of the photos Madrigal posts are captioned, but the placement of this picture gives the impression of being a first look back soon after launch. It’s a beautiful picture, but not extraordinary, probably even at the time. We’d been in space before, and seen the Earth from above. It’s the sort of picture that years ago someone of a dreamy bent might have observed is free from political boundaries, but what’s really striking is the compressed frame.

The second picture is a little bit different.

moving away

The first photo is a close picture, at least in cosmic terms, but the second picture, in this context, is a record of motion. It’s a look back from farther away, far enough to see the full globe against the darkness of space. By placing the photographs in a line, in relation as part of a narrative, the distance became for me for the first time part of a journey, and put me next to the human being who activated the shutter, far from home and getting farther.

Apollo 11′s trip to the moon is a feat that was equalled a handful of times, but still, more than 40 years later, never surpassed. Within my lifetime at least, it may never be. (I should have a lot of time left. I’d love to be proven wrong.)

The Apollo misions are still a unique part of human history. The moon is still as far as we’ve ever stepped. Take a look at the pictures again.

And thank you, Mr. Madrigal, for the assembly, and the reminder of exactly what narrative can do.

Link's yard

Image from Insanely Gaming, by way of Kotaku.

Harbach and Franzen

I’m about halfway through Chad Harbach’s The Art of Fielding, and enjoying it very much.

There’s a blurb on the cover from Jonathan Franzen, and while there’s a lot in the book that puts me in mind of Franzen — the style of the prose and the way that the characters fight with each other, skilled at inflicting pain, driven by their own self-loathing and self-doubt — there are also brief but fully realized chapters that focuses on the characters in times when they are richly and deeply happy.

In the two of Franzen’s novels that I’ve read — The Corrections and Freedom — the world is so broken that there is no way to imagine unbrokenness. Even were it possible, it’s not entirely clear that Franzen’s characters could recognize happiness. They have nothing to compare it to.

As befits a baseball novel, Harbaugh gives each of his characters fleeting moments of perfection — briefly narrated, but sometimes lasting months at a time. No one can love baseball without seeing or experiencing one of those moments. It’s what keeps us playing (or watching) so many pitches, so many innings, so many games, never knowing when it’ll happen and talking about it for years when it does.

It’s easy to be indifferent to fiction (and baseball), but right now, 250 pages into a 500-page first novel, I can love Harbach for treating his characters with honesty and generosity. I can love him for being a baseball fan.

(Update, 7/6/12: I finished the book yesterday. It’s not perfect, but it’s still the best novel I’ve read in a year or two. Highly recommended.)

Blog at WordPress.com.
Theme: Esquire by Matthew Buchanan.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.